Evaluation of the Bacillus Cereus Strain 1-p Protease for the Unhairing of Goatskins during Leather Production

The unhairing stage of leather processing is associated with the production of significant amounts of solid and liquid wastes. The use of enzymes to replace the polluting sulphides currently used for unhairing is a viable alternative. Various proteases from different Bacillus cereus strains as well as many other bacterial strains have been used successfully for the unhairing of skins. However, no previous work has assessed the use of the crude alkaline protease extract from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p, a novel Bacillus cereus strain obtained from the shores of Lake Bogoria a soda lake in Kenya – in the unhairing of goatskins. This study, therefore, evaluates the potential of the protease extract from the Bacillus cereus strain 1-p to unhair goatskins. Optimum variables for unhairing using the protease were investigated. Complete unhairing was achieved within 12 hours at 27°C and pH 12 using the crude enzyme. The period and temperature required for complete unhairing were significantly lower than that of other enzymatic unhairing techniques. Compared to the leather unhaired with sulphide, the leather unhaired with the enzyme did not only show superior organoleptic properties but also recorded comparable or superior physical properties, namely tensile strength (26.94 N/mm2), percentage elongation (76.29%), tear strength (43.59 N/mm), and distension at grain crack and burst (7.9 mm and 8.2 mm respectively). The wastewater from the enzymatic unhairing process recorded a significant reduction in biochemical oxygen demand (78%), chemical oxygen demand (83%), and the wastewater volume (50%) compared to the process that uses sulphide. It was concluded that the use of the crude protease extract from the Bacillus cereus strain 1-p in unhairing goatskins is feasible.


INTRODUCTION
Leather is a valuable prehistoric natural commodity that is being used in modern times, and plays an indispensable economic role globally. Leather and finished leather products are estimated to have a global value of about USD 100 billion annually [1]. In the year 2013, footwear made of leather accounted for approxi-6.0-9.0 but also at a relatively high-temperature range of 60-70°C, a temperature that would denature the raw collagen fibres in raw hides and skins during unhairing. In another study, an alkaline protease obtained from Bacillus cereus MCM B-326 was used to unhair a buffalo hide successfully at pH 7.0 and a temperature of 28 ± 2°C [27]. The protease, however, required 21 hours to achieve the complete unhairing of the hides. This period is quite lengthy for an ideal leather production line. A protease extracted from Bacillus cereus strain SZ-4 exhibited considerable hair removal capability on bovine, hircine, porcine and ovine skins within a period of 12 hours [28]. These were appreciable results as it was further reported that the enzyme did not change the structure of the dermis. The protease extract from the Bacillus cereus strain 1-p was reported to have successfully descaled a Nile perch skin (Lates niloticus) within a period of one hour and also reported positive results in the unhairing of a bull hide [25]. The results observed from the descaling process of Nile perch fish skins were remarkable as the descaling was achieved in a short time under a pH and temperature range that can be applied to raw skins without damaging the collagen structure. Although extensive research has been carried out on enzymatic unhairing using extracts from various bacterial strains and more so, the Bacillus cereus, no work has been published on the enzymatic unhairing of goatskins by using a crude enzyme extract from a novel Bacillus cereus strain 1-p obtained from the shores of Lake Bogoria, a soda lake in the Rift Valley, Kenya. The working hypothesis is that the crude alkaline protease extracted from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p has the potential to unhair goatskins that would eliminate the use of sodium sulphide during leather processing. This is aimed at finding a viable alternative to the toxic chemicals used in the unhairing stage of leather processing, which would make leather-making cleaner and translate to a more sustainable industry.

Materials
Wet salted goatskins were purchased from a local slaughterhouse in Nairobi, Kenya. Tanning and laboratory chemicals were acquired locally, while the isolated bacteria were cultured and the enzyme extracted at the Biochemistry Laboratory, University of Nairobi. The chemicals used in this study in the laboratory and tannery were of analytical and commercial grade. The crude protease was prepared from a Bacillus cereus bacteria, strain 1-p, which had previously been isolated, cultured and identified using the analysis of 16S r DNA sequencing method [25]. The crude protease from this bacterial strain was studied in this work following the positive results reported from its use in descaling of Nile perch skins [25].

Enzyme preparation
The enzyme was prepared at optimum conditions as described in a previous method [25]. A 3-litre medium was prepared with the following components: magnesium sulphate (MgSO 4 .7H 2 O), calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ), urea, yeast, casein, glucose and distilled water. The pH was adjusted to 11.5 and left to rest for two hours for pH stabilization before sterilization of the media and the flasks to be used. An overnight bacterium seed culture (Bacillus cereus strain 1-p) in sterile distilled water was inoculated into the 3-litre medium setup in a bioreactor (Bioengineering RALF) set at 150 rpm, pH 11.5 and 45˚ C and incubated for 72 hours. The culture-medium was then obtained and centrifuged at 12,000 revolutions per minute for fifteen minutes to extract the supernatant. The supernatant was recovered and stored in covered flasks at 4°C awaiting use in the unhairing of goatskins.

Enzyme assay
The crude protease activity was investigated under optimized variables (pH 11 and 45°C) as described by Wanyonyi et al. (2015) following a modification of their method. The activity was determined using casein as the substrate at an alkaline pH. 0.1 ml of the crude enzyme was incubated with 0.1 ml of 1% w/v casein in the buffer-Tris-HCl (0.2 M, pH 9.0) at 45°C for 10 min. After the completion of the incubation, the reaction was terminated by addition of 4 ml of chilled trichloroacetic acid and placed on ice for 20 minutes to facilitate precipitation of insoluble proteins. The mixture was subsequently centrifuged for 10 minutes. 5 ml of 0.4 M sodium carbonate and 1 ml of diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was added into the supernatant and incubated for 30 minutes. The absorbance was measured against a blank at 660 nm using a UV-spectrophotometer. One unit of the crude protease activity (U) was described as 1 μg of tyrosine liberated per minute per ml under standard assay conditions.

Optimization of unhairing
Factors affecting the unhairing of goatskins using the crude alkaline protease were studied and optimized to achieve maximum unhairing. The effect of temperature, pH and enzyme dilution was evaluated by dipping goatskin pieces in the crude enzyme and examining the extent of hair removal periodically. Three goatskins were cut into test pieces measuring 10x10 cm, which were washed and soaked in clean water for 2 hours in order to be rid of salt and dirt. The goatskin pieces were dipped in flasks with the 250 ml crude protease (0.45 U/ml) at 25°C and a pH range of pH 2 to 13 to assess the effect of pH on unhairing. A negative control experiment was also run in flasks under similar conditions but 250 ml of distilled water was used in place of the crude enzyme. The removed hair was weighed and expressed as a percentage against the total hair recovered after the complete unhairing. The percentage was established as per the area without hair compared to the test piece's total area. A complete hair removal was treated as 100% while no hair removal was 0%. The flasks, covered with cotton wool and aluminium foil, were shaken at intervals of 10 min. Gentle scrubbing using a blunt piece of wood was done to assess the ease of hair removal after every hour. Goatskin pieces were dipped in flasks with 250 ml of crude protease (0.45 U/ml) at pH 12, within a temperature margin of 25°C -35°C in order to study the effect of temperature on the unhairing. Similarly, a negative control experiment with 250 ml of distilled water in place of the crude enzyme at pH 12 was run within the same temperature range. The flasks, covered with cotton wool and aluminium foil, were shaken at intervals of 10 minutes and the ease of hair removal was determined after every hour. Other goatskin test pieces were dipped in flasks with the crude protease diluted in different proportions; 100% (250 ml of crude enzyme -0.45 U/ml), 80% (200 ml of crude enzyme -0.45 U/ml, diluted with 50 ml of distilled water), 60% (150 ml of crude enzyme -0.45 U/ml, diluted with 100 ml of distilled water), 40% (100 ml crude enzyme -0.45 U/ml, diluted with 150 ml of distilled water), 20% (50 ml of crude enzyme -0.45 U/ml, diluted with 200 ml of distilled water) and 0% (250 ml of distilled water), all adjusted to pH 12 to investigate the impact of enzyme dilution on unhairing. The flasks were observed at 27°C to allow the enzyme activity to take place. The ease of hair removal was determined at intervals of one hour.

Enzymatic leather processing
Once the unhairing conditions had been optimized, the unhairing of full goat skins was done with the crude alkaline protease at the optimized conditions at a local tannery. Experimental tannery drums were used to process a total of nine (9) goatskins in replicates of three using the enzyme extract. A positive control experiment was also set up to unhair 9 goatskins using sodium sulphide, also in triplicates. All the skins were washed thoroughly and soaked for 16 hours in the presence of a 0.2% biocide, 0.1% wetting agent and 0.5% soda ash before the start of the unhairing process. The amount of all the chemicals used was calculated as a percentage of raw weight. A complete unhairing in the experimental group was achieved using the undiluted crude protease, at the optimized pH 12 and 27°C, in 12 hours. The pelt was gently scraped using a blunt blade to remove the hair, which was recovered, washed and dried. The pelts were then limed and subsequently fleshed for the recovery of sulphide-free flesh and fats. Similarly, the positive control group was conventionally unhaired using the lime-sulphide system and fleshed. The subsequent pre-tanning, tanning and post-tanning stages were carried out in similar standard treatments for the sulphide-unhaired and the enzyme-unhaired goatskins. Notably, the experimental group was not subjected to the bating process after deliming as the pelts were clean and well opened up, unlike the control group. The chrome-tanned leathers were processed to crust leather as per a standard procedure.

Organoleptic examination and physical tests of the processed leather
The enzyme-unhaired leathers were examined for visual and physical properties and compared to the lime-sulphide unhaired leathers. Various organoleptic properties that include appearance, softness, fullness, wrinkles, colour intensity and uniformity of the enzyme-unhaired and the sulphide-unhaired leathers were examined visually and through touch. They were then rated from 0 to 10 points for every examined parameter by three experienced leather technologists with higher points representing a superior quality. Leather samples for physical testing were acquired through a standard sampling procedure as stipulated by the ISO 2418:2002 standard [29]. Eighteen (18) pieces of the enzyme-unhaired goatskin leathers were cut by applying the standard dumbbell-shaped press knife to the grain surface. Nine (9) test pieces were obtained with the longer side parallel to the backline and nine (9) with the longer edge perpendicular to the backbone. These test samples were conditioned in a standard atmosphere and standard conditions; at the temperature of 23 ± 2°C and the humidity of 50 ± 5% for 48 hours as specified by the ISO 2419:2002 standard before testing [30]. The physical tests, such as tensile strength, tear strength and grain distension were tested as per the International Union for Physical testing for leather (IUP) methods. Tensile strength and elongation were tested in line with the ISO 3376:2002 standard [31]. The jaws of the tensile testing instrument were set apart and the samples secured in-between, aligning the jaw clamps with the midline. The machine was run and the jaws began to separate, stretching the test piece until it broke and the load recorded. The tear strength of the leather samples was measured by the Instron testing machine following the standard test method ISO3377-2:2002 [32]. A notched sample was clumped between the machine jaws. Upon the running of the machine, the jaws separated until the test piece tore and the load recorded. The strength of the grain was tested as per the standard ISO 3379:2015 [33]. A disk-shaped test piece was distended by pushing through the flesh side and observing the grain surface for incipient cracking and bursting and subsequently recorded as the distension at grain crack and distension at grain burst respectively.

Analysis of resultant liquor
The resultant wastewaters from the control (sulphide unhairing) and the experimental (enzymatic unhairing) groups were obtained after the unhairing stage and analyzed for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solids (TDS) and total suspended solids (TSS) following the standard technique [34].

Data analysis
The data were analyzed by using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 statistical tool. The T-test analysis was done to compare the means of the physical properties of the enzyme-unhaired goatskin leathers to the conventionally processed ones to assess the statistical difference of the results obtained (Significance level; α< 0.05). The differences were concluded to be significant when p<0.05.

Effect of the pH on enzymatic unhairing
The crude enzyme extracted after the 72h fermentation was assayed for its proteolytic activity. It was found that the activity of the crude protease from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p was 0.45 U/ml at the optimized variables. Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) is well known to affect the enzyme activity, because enzymes are proteins in nature, thus sensitive to changes in the pH [35]. The effect of the pH on the enzymatic unhairing of goatskins was studied at the pH range 2-13 at 25°C and the observations were summarized in Figure 1. The results showed that at a low pH (acidic), there was no hair removal throughout the observation period. Partial hair removal was first recorded at pH 12, 11, 9, 8 and pH 7 after 2, 4, 5, 5 and 6 hours respectively. Complete hair removal was only observed at pH 12 and 11 after 7 and 12 hours respectively. Negative control experiments containing distilled water in place of the crude enzyme at a pH range of 2 to 12 showed no removal, indicating that the crude protease enzyme was solely responsible for the unhairing. The observed increase in unhairing efficiency with the increase in pH can be attributed to the increased effect on ionic and hydrogen bonds of the protease, which are important to the enzyme shape and its activity [36]. The observed results correspond to the properties of alkaline enzymes previously reported to show the highest unhairing rate at pH 8 to pH 12 [23][24][25][37][38][39][40].

Effect of temperature on the enzymatic unhairing
Increase in temperature increases the reaction rate up to a specific temperature limit, beyond which the enzyme is denatured [41]. The effect of temperature on enzymatic unhairing of goatskins was investigated within the range of 25°C-35°C, at pH 12 using the undiluted crude protease, and the results displayed in Figure 2. The unhairing efficiency increased with an increase in the temperature. 100% hair removal was attained after 5 and 6 hours at 35°C and 33°C respectively. At 27°C and 25°C, complete unhairing was achieved after 7 hours. The negative control experiments showed no hair removal. These findings are significantly positive as hair removal was achieved in an acceptable temperature range for the raw hides and skins in a significantly short period. High temperatures are avoided in the early stages of leather processing because the shrinkage/denaturation temperature for raw skins is approximately 65°C around neutral pH while at high pH the skin's shrinkage temperature reduces to 50°C or less; it is thus recommended that the temperature for the soaking, unhairing and liming of skins must be limited to less than 30°C [42]. These observations showed a significant potential of the protease enzyme from the Bacillus cereus strain 1-p to be used for unhairing. These results are better than those reported of other microbial enzymatic unhairing techniques that required significantly higher temperature ranges to achieve complete hair removal [14,17,23].

Effect of the enzyme activity on the unhairing activity
Enzyme concentration affects the rate of enzyme activity by altering the number of enzyme molecules present. The effect of the enzyme dilution on unhairing of goatskins was determined at 27°C and pH 12 using proportions of the crude enzyme diluted using distilled water and the results presented in Figure 3. The results show that the protease unhairing efficiency decreased with the increase in the crude enzyme dilution. Complete hair removal was first observed in the ratio 100:0 after 7 hours while the ratios 80:20 and 60:40 took 9 hours and 10 hours respectively to achieve complete unhairing. This can be ascribed to the fact that the enzyme activity is highly dependent on its molecular concentration, which means that a high enzyme concentration translates to high enzyme activity [43]. Although various factors affecting the enzymatic unhairing have been investigated and are well established, the effect of the enzyme dilution has not been extensively studied and documented. Nonetheless, as an increase in dilution generally lowers the concentration of enzyme molecules present in a specific volume, these findings correspond to those reported from the use of a protease extract from Bacillus crolab MTCC 5468 to unhair goatskins where the unhairing activity and efficiency increased with the increase in enzyme concentration, thus a complete unhairing was achieved faster [7].

Unhairing of full goatskins
The established optimum variables were used to unhair full goatskins by using the crude protease derived from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p at a local tannery. A positive control run was set up, where goatskins were unhaired using sodium sulphide. It was noted that the crude protease achieved complete unhairing in 12 hours without the emission of any pungent smell. This was slightly longer than the period (7 hours) required to completely unhair test pieces at the laboratory scale. This can be attributed to the varying processing conditions, such as the temperature and the pH in the tannery processing drum. The novel protease from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p recorded a relatively shorter unhairing period compared to the ones reported from previous studies on alkaline proteases that reported unhairing periods of 16 hours up to 24 hours [13,14,22,44,45]. Visual examination of the pelts after the completion of the unhairing process showed that the pelt from the experimental group (enzyme-unhaired) was whiter and had a cleaner grain surface, void of hair follicles and epidermal structures, compared to the control group (sulphide-unhaired), which had darker patches, as displayed in Figure 4. This necessitated a further process step, bating of sulphide-unhaired pelts, the aim of which was to make the grain surface cleaner by removing scud and epidermal debris [46]. These results are in agreement with those reported by the previous research studies [8,13,47,48].
A significant amount of intact hair was recovered from the enzymatic unhairing system while the sulphide system produced hair that was turned into a sludge-like mass (pulped form) with no distinctive structure. The hair was easily sieved out of the unhairing liquor, thus reducing the solid waste in the resultant effluent stream. Similar observations have been reported from previous enzymatic unhairing studies, whereby undamaged hair was recovered, which translated to the overall reduction of the pollution load in the wastewater [13,[48][49][50]. Both groups of unhaired pelts were further processed, tanned into wet-blue and post-tanned into crust leather as displayed in Figure 5. The physical properties of the experimental and control groups were tested and compared.

Organoleptic and physical properties of the resultant leather
Physical properties of leather are vital quality parameters that determine the leather's performance characteristics in various applications, while organoleptic features indicate the general appeal of leather. The overall properties of the enzyme-processed leathers were either similar or better compared to the sulphideprocessed leathers. Organoleptic properties of leather make the product unique and valuable for various applications.

Organoleptic properties
The visual and hand assessment of the conventional and the enzyme-unhaired leathers by experienced leather technologists showed that the enzyme-unhaired leathers were comparable or marginally better in appearance, softness, fullness, colour intensity and uniformity as presented in Table 1. The enzyme-unhaired leathers generally showed superior properties in the assessed parameters with the following ratings: appearance (9.5), softness (9.5), fullness (9.2) and colour intensity and uniformity (9.6) compared to the conventionally processed leathers with the ratings: appearance (8.9), softness (8.5), fullness (8.8) and colour intensity and uniformity (9.2). It was also notable that wrinkles were more prevalent in the enzyme-unhaired group (rated 9.8) compared to the sulphide-unhaired group (rated 9.0). The enzyme-unhaired leather was of good quality characterized by uniform colour, smooth grain, appreciable flexibility and a good appearance without any scud. This general observation has been attributed to the enhanced uptake of processing chemicals following the sufficient opening up of the fibre matrix as documented by previous research on enzymatic unhairing that reported similar results [7,12,13,18,47]. The general appearance of the conventionally and enzymatically treated goatskin leathers had a clear and clean grain without any foreign materials, but the enzyme-unhaired leathers were rated higher for the smooth feel, the gloss of the grain surface, a good handle, colour evenness and the general fullness of the leather structure. This can also be attributed to the enhanced absorption of tanning chemicals following the adequate splitting of collagen fibres. Similar observations on the appearance and fullness of the enzymeunhaired leather have previously been reported [7]. The 'fibres splitting' effect of the enzyme processing also influences the uptake of colour and dye material, thus giving the leather the observed deeper and more uniform colour [14]. The average ratings on the softness of the leathers suggest that the enzymatically processed leathers were much softer than the sulphide-processed leathers. Enzymatically processed leathers have previously been reported to be softer due to the enzyme�s action on non-structural proteins [12,51]. This implies that enzyme application softens leather and makes it more pliable to the feel and touch. Leather softness can be associated with the fibre opening up [52]. Besides fully opening up the collagen structure, it is reported that enzymatic unhairing degrades the elastin network as opposed to the lime-sulphide system [48]. The soft feel of the leather produced by the enzymatic unhairing process, therefore, can be explained by the removal of elastin, making it more flexible, supple and pliable. This is a desirable feature for the production of soft and pliable products like upholstery, garment and glove leathers. Similar observations on the enzyme-unhaired leathers being softer compared to the sulphide-unhaired ones have been reported [53]. The enzyme-unhaired leathers were also characterized by many wrinkles compared to the sulphide-unhaired leathers. The degradation of the elastin can also explain the evident prevalence of wrinkles in the enzymeprocessed leathers. Elastin is an important protein that enables the skin to resume its shape after stretching or contracting. Hence, after its degradation, the leather surface does not regain its shape after distortion. Similar observations were made when an enzyme extract from Bacillus crolab MTCC 5468 was used to process goatskins [7]. Table 2 shows the physical properties of the resultant crust leathers. The general outlook of the sulphideunhaired and the enzyme-unhaired leather was comparable. The physical properties of both groups of leather met the minimum recommended standards [54]. The leathers obtained from enzymatic unhairing showed comparable tensile strength, distension at grain crack and distension at grain burst values to sulphideunhaired leathers with no significant difference between them (p values 0.81, 0.489 and 0.147 respectively). The elongation at break and tear strength values for the experimental leathers showed that there may be a significant difference when compared to the control samples (p values 0.026 and 0.037 respectively). The comparability of the physical properties can be attributed to the fact that both unhairing techniques preserve the collagen content without causing damage. These results show that the crude protease does not compromise the strength of the collagen structure and therefore the technique is effective and practically feasible. Additionally, these results correspond to the properties of enzymatically unhaired leathers previously described, showing comparable or superior physical properties when compared to sulphideunhaired leathers [13,47,48]. Notably, the grain distension resistance of the enzyme-unhaired leathers was better than that of the sulphide-unhaired leathers as presented in Table 2. This can be attributed to the fact that the enzyme action is less harsh to the grain layer compared to the sulphide action and also the enhanced absorption of tannins, which has been previously observed and reported in the enzymatically processed leathers [7,18].

Physical properties
Further observations were made concerning the sampling direction of the samples obtained for physical testing. Similar trends were observed in both the enzyme-unhaired and the sulphide-unhaired leathers concerning the sampling direction for tensile strength, percentage elongation and tear strength, as shown by the results in Table 2. The tests pieces sampled parallel to the backbone recorded higher tensile strength values (sulphide-unhaired: 33.01 N/mm 2 and enzyme-unhaired: 33.73 N/mm 2 ) than the perpendicularlysampled test pieces (sulphide-unhaired: 16.87 N/mm 2 and enzyme-unhaired: 20.13 N/mm 2 ). For the samples cut parallel to the backbone, most of their fibres are aligned in the same direction as the applied stress, hence having very little room to orientate towards the strain axis [55]. This means that the leather fibres themselves are strained, as there is minimal strain/stretch gained, as there is a minimal orientation of the fibres, explaining the higher tensile strength values. These conclusions are in agreement with those observed on the enzyme-unhaired leathers and the general behaviour of leathers during physical testing with regard to the sampling direction [13,56]. On the contrary, the samples cut perpendicularly to the backbone had higher percentage elongation and tear strength than those sampled parallel, as shown in the results in For the test pieces cut parallel to the backline, the fibre network is assumed to be naturally orientated to the same direction as the strain axis. In this case, the specific work of fracture was higher because the tear does not grow through the fibre diameters but instead propagates in a more straightforward rupturing process and hence the tear strength is low [56]. The percentage elongation is equally lower in these samples as the stress acts on the leather fibres themselves, which are strained with minimal stress. Similar findings concerning sampling direction when carrying out physical tests have been reported [48,[55][56][57].

Pollution load in resultant wastewater
Wastewaters from both unhairing techniques were assessed and the results are presented in Table 3. The results are expressed in parts per million (ppm). The presence of organic matter in wastewater contributes to increased BOD, COD, TDS and TSS [7]. It is clear from the results that the enzymatic unhairing, using the crude protease from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p, leads to a significant reduction in BOD by 78%, COD by 83%, TDS by 75% and TSS by 62%. It was equally notable that the volume of the wastewater produced after the unhairing process was reduced by 50% in the enzymatic technique. The hair shafts were removed completely intact and recovered from the unhairing liquor; hence the wastewater was free from hair and epidermal matter unlike in the conventional technique. The significant reduction in the pollution load can be attributed to the complete elimination of sodium sulphide which solubilizes the hair and epidermis during the unhairing. These findings agree with previous findings from enzymatic unhairing systems that reported that enzymes drastically shrink the effluent pollution load and help in hair recovery [25]. Similar results have been reported from proteolytic alkaline unhairing systems indicating a significant reduction of the pollution loads from the unhairing wastewater streams [7,14]. However, the pollution load reduction from the unhairing process using this novel protease recorded a higher reduction compared to that reported by Senthilvelan et al. (2012), with a 62.8% and 79.0% reduction in BOD and COD respectively. Hence, the protease extract from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p is a viable and potential alternative for cleaner leather production. The overall cost of leather production to the crust stage after the unhairing using the crude protease was approximately 0.55 USD per square foot compared to the cost of the conventional processing which was approximately 0.49 USD per square foot. The cost of the enzymatic unhairing technique was estimated from an inclusive calculation of the costs of all the laboratory reagents used for the enzyme extraction together with the processing chemicals at the tannery. Despite the slightly higher cost of production, the enzyme technique significantly reduced the pollution load, which would reduce the cost of effluent treatment and thus, give it an edge over the conventional technique.

CONCLUSION
This Bacillus cereus strain demonstrated the ability to secrete proteases that acted on the epidermal structure and hair, thus enabling their removal. The complete unhairing of the goatskins using the crude protease extract from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p took 12 hours at a relatively low temperature of 27°C. This unhairing technique yields leather that has comparable or even superior strength properties as well as organoleptic properties such as softness, fullness and colour uniformity when compared to the sulphide unhairing technique. The enzyme also facilitated the removal of the hair intact, which not only lowers the pollution load in the wastewater but also leads to recovery of the hair, which can be used for other industrial applications. The novel crude alkaline protease enzyme from Bacillus cereus strain 1-p can, therefore, be used to make leather processing cleaner and sustainable by eliminating the use of sodium sulphide without compromising on the quality of the resultant leather, and should, therefore, be explored for industrial applications and commercialization.